Discussion: Tagging problem — 1 year ago
I generally have a problem using or assigning tags – keywords – to things because my mind wants to classify things hierarchically. Ask me to come up with tags for something, and I usually draw a blank.
But today I finally hit on something that I thought might be useful: assign the tag “provincial capital” to those cities that are the capital of a province. There is no other way in this system for that classification, after all. So, while I was trying to put some order into Turkmenistan, I assigned that tag to provincial capitals.
To my horror I found that tag also assigned to the provinces they are a capital of, and worse, to the country those provinces are a part of.
Surely, tags are not hierarchical, but just applied to the things they are actually attached to? If tags are “inherited” upward like that, it makes a joke of applying tags to things. (If a singel city is busy and smoggy that doesn’t make the whole country so…)
Am I misinterpreting what tags are, or is 43P using tags in a really strange way?
I reported the “upward inheritance” I saw as a problem, only to have it assigned Won’t fix – without any comment – which is not very helpful either.
I then thought I could fix the problem by removing the tags again from the cities I’d assigned it to – only to find that while removing them there works, the “upward inheritance” is still there. So Turkmenistan somehow still is provincial capital even though none of its provincial capitals still have that tag! That’s nuts.
If there is no way to assign a tag to one thing only, without having it spread to other things that it doesn’t refer to – how does one use tags usefully?
And how can the useless and now-removed tags be cleared from the country and provinces they don’t refer to but were assigned to automatically by “upward inheritance”, other than by removing the tags from where they were actually assigned to (which I already did)?
Really – Turkmenistan is not a provincial capital. It’s a country.























