You've been to 0% of these places

Notable Cities of Europe

The best cities in europe















  1. Brilliant city with so much to offer. That is why it is the UKs most visited city outside London.

    edit




























  2. As much as I love this city I actual work here with Equator Digital Agency. There is so much to do in Glasgow that you will never be bored.

    edit




  3. Brilliant city. The Liverpudlians are crazy people but nice.

    edit









More about these places


Comments


Pages: 1

(This comment was deleted.)

(This comment was deleted.)
czechnewwaver

czechnewwaver
0 places

Where are Milan and Dresden?

Or Lucern, Switzerland, among others?

(This comment was deleted.)

(This comment was deleted.)
Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Yes, the list is quite excentric.

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Yes, Leipzig, and Weimar should also be here.

prc152

prc152
0 places

The incompleteness of this list troubles me

also… manchester, liverpool, monaco, cork, geneva, lyon, toulouse, naples,

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Cork! You’ve got to be kidding. Apart from the cathedral there’s nothing there. You would have to include Ely on those grounds.

Bristol perhaps.

And what about Oxford and Cambridge?

(This comment was deleted.)
Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Italian cities are being maligned!

Good suggestion.

Italy is especially poorly served. I’m not sure if Milan, Naples, Sienna or Padua are on it either.

Ameerah

Ameerah
Dubai

Moscow??

Hmmm … am i thick or is moscow in europe??? I am a flight attendant and fly there allot just never knew i went to Europe lol

PeetTheEngineer

PeetTheEngineer
Zürich

Asia start behind the Ural. Russia is in Europe and Asia.

salamista

salamista
Bratislava

This list was at first list of all capital cities, then some other people made few changes, but Moscow as capital of Russia stayed there.

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Moscow is within the European part of Russia.

(This comment was deleted.)
Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

No it shouldn’t.

Can anyone tell me what’s so notable about Stuttgart? What about Palma de Mallorca, apart from its situation on a nice and popular island..? Anyway, I think there’s too much of Germany and Spain in this list.

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

I am not sure about Stuttgart. It has a major modern art museum and an airport, but not much more.

Palma de Majjorca has a splendid cathedral, of course, but I agree, it seems odd to include it when, say Naples and St Petersburg are absent.

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

St petersburg

St Petersburg is missing, whis just silly when they include Belfast.

Italy should be better served.


I guess they wanted to spread the cities all over Europe, but the truth is that Italy just punches above its size:

Padua,

Sienna

Turin

Trieste

Naples,

Palermo,

Milan

Bologna

I deleted stupid Stuttgart and Palma de Mallorca now and added St. Petersburg instead, so that it’s 50 again now. I think Belfast is kinda notable for its troubles with stubborn catholics and protestants. And I don’t know much about these Italian places, I’m afraid.

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

The Italian places are all fairly large, except for Sienna and Padua, which I included because of their importance as a Renaissance cities.

Lisili

Lisili
Jena

I guess, you wouldn’t say that about Belfast, if you’ve ever been there! Consider the historical importance regarding Anglo-irish politics and its outcome on American history and lifestyle. I promise: Belfast will give you goose bumps.

Can’t say the same of all those Italian cities – just gave me headaches because of the crowds of tourists!

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Notable cities: a points system?

It seems to me that the list could easily be expanded to include about 80 cities.

I would suggest that the criteria have to be refined substantially.

a. Are the cities in question notable for historical events? or as capitals?

Should population size be the criteria, with larger cities being given priority?

c. Or is architecture the main thing?

d. Or economic importance?

e. Or cultural facilities? (museums, galleries, libraries, bookshops

f. Food and Drink?

Perhaps one could develop a points system, according points to each of these criteria, so that Paris, which is important for a all six would be awarded the maximum of 60 points, while Bruges, which is only important in point c. and e. would get 20 points.

London is the only other city that would get this maximum score.

A city like Warsaw, which is medium sized would get 10 for historical events, only 5 for population, five for economic importance and perhaps 5 for architecture, and 5 for cultural facilities and 5 for food, totalling get 30 points (I may be being generous here).

Only cities which reached up to 30 points would be included?

What do you think?

This is an interesting suggestion, but would be quite a hazzle… And actually I think one aspect could be enough to make a city notable – but there has to be at least one aspect that makes the place more worth visiting than most other European cities. And I think there shouldn’t be more than 50 cities on the list.

So how about looking for each city’s main justification, such as

  • Brussels: capital of European Union
  • Rome: historical center of Roman Empire that shaped much of Europe
  • Berlin: history of east/west division (city, country, continent)



    If there is no special reason for a city to be part of this list, then it can be deleted.
Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Your suggestion has the merit of simplicity.

But I am not sure whether it follows through that a place which is important for historical reasons is necessarily therefore interesting or worthwhile to visit.

For instance, for a time Aachen was the centre of the Holy Roman empire, but apart from a small cathedral, there is really very little to see there.

And there would remain the difficulty of weighing the importance of one criteria over another.

Does the fact that Brussels is head of the EC make it more “listworthy” than a second city of less contemporary significance, such as, say St Petersburg?

But very few people would chose to visit Bruussels over St Petersburg…unless they were mentally ill.

Ok, I tried to make it short, but like that it wasn’t obvious enough…

A place of historical importance is not necessarily interesting, but the main reason for Rome is its history which has left lots of interesting sites.

Brussels’ notability, for example, is more arguable. Yet it’s a big city in the middle of Europe, it’s multilingual, there’s some notable architecture that made it a world heritage place, you can visit the EU headquarters, and many people might indeed just be curious about the “European capital”.

I just think there should be a comment on each of the cities. Like that, it could become more obvious that some of them should better be replaced by, for example, some of your Italian places.

But if you feel like suggesting a complex ranking system, you’re of course welcome to do that ;)

Tadeusz598

Tadeusz598
Florianópolis

Thanks…no it wasn’t obvious what you were suggesting.

You still haven’t said how you would resolve the inevitable conflicts between the listing of x city versus y city, which is why this discussion started in the first place, and which my points sysytem was intended to, at least formalise the terms of.

I shall attempt to produce a more rigourously evaluated list of fifty cities.

wysiwyg

wysiwyg
Southampton

interesting list, but...

if Birmingham is worth putting on the list, then so are a whole load more cities. It is worth visiting, but not necessarily in the context of this list I think.

So pleeeez delete it from this list!

I didn’t dare to, because I thought I was just biased and clueless…

(This comment was deleted.)
mutantfrog

mutantfrog
0 places

Birmingham, but not Lyon

or Lisbon, or… well, many others. How peculiar.

thattaylorgirl

thattaylorgirl
Lexington

Prague

I’m so excited to see Prague this summer!! I can’t wait!!

BGGirlinUS

BGGirlinUS
Davis

Where is Prague?

The exclusion of Prague from this list is inexcusable. It is not only one of the most beautiful cities in Europe, but in the world

kekka

kekka
Oslo

Good point!

It should be on this list. It’s the most beautiful city in Europa I’ve been to. Maybe not the most interesting, but it looks like a fairytale :)

I love Prague!


 
Pages: 1

This list has gotten 4 cheers.



or
Login with Facebook