dumpycactus
Hong Kong
Worth visiting!
“when in china, where you need to be is where the crowd is headed…”, he said.
and so i did. for a short while anyway.
i went across china from guangzhou to lhasa, and did some random bus-ing and hitching until i made it to nepal. knowing mandarin would’ve helped heaps. having a TTB permit would’ve too.
dumpycactus
Hong Kong
nice!
the unreasonable rage is greatly amusing.
in rebuttal; i made no comment of whether they are rightly or wrongly linked; however, tibet is indeed a part of china in geographical terms.
discussions about political indoctrination can be held elsewhere.
kaden
New Milford
not really unreasonable sorry bud, when people steal things and no one does anything it is a great cause for concern, i’m sorry if you think stealing a country is okay, sounds like a personal problem though so please dont involve me in it. i merely stateed this so as people who read your comment and might think you know what you are talking about when you certianly dont. TIBET IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TOP OF THE GODDAMN HIMALAYAS. THIS IS NOT PART OF CHINA geographically. you are a disinformation agent, leave the innocents minds alone they are not yours.
dumpycactus
Hong Kong
this is actually my favourite part of your comment, but somehow its been abandoned by public sphere:
“people likeyou will die very slowly i’m sure of it, this is in regards to youtrying to make me more mad by being calm and “collected” in yourresponse, well bad news bud im smarter than you”
you seem to have poor reading comprehension, so i will state this bluntly for all:
i never mentioned any opinion about the political situation, so your assumption is quite premature (or immature?).
people can figure out for themselves how they choose to feel about the situation, so i’m not about to make personal statements on that. by the by, you involved yourself – don’t be backpedaling now!
tibet is not “in the middle of the top of goddamn himalayas”; the himalayas are a part of tibet and not the dominating entity (physically). i shouldn’t really mention this but you’re quite keen on arguing semantics.
while in that stroke,
tibet is officially claimed by the people’s republic of CHINA, so it’s possible to regard it to be as a part of it, where you are harping pretty strongly on the phrase ‘tibetan autonomous region’.
your erratic english is much entertainment; but it’s rather difficult to take it seriously when you’re just trippin’ balls.
by the way, i hope you spelled “genghis khan” incorrectly on purpose.
