In recent years, several authors, most notably Gian J. Quasar, have raised several questions as to the veracity of Kusche’s findings about Bermuda Triangle, including but not limited to: why Kusche so often brought up as evidence for his claims cases that were already well-known before the writing of his work as not being “Triangle incidents”; his misidentification and mislocation of several ship and aircraft incidents that are well-documented, but then using that inability to properly identify the craft as “proof” that they never existed; holding to his claims that ‘nothing out of the ordinary’ regularly occurred in and around the area, and yet several times admitting certain cases lacked conventional rational explanation (most notably in the Star Tiger and DC-3 cases), and in other examples openly claiming possibilities for foul weather for certain disappearances where it can be verified that none existed.